Evidence: Science

It has to be said that there are endless examples of organisms for which Evolution is no explanation.  The problem is, and it has to be fully appreciated, that just one failure of evolutionary theory, just one example of an organism, or of a situation, which evolutionary theory cannot explain, makes the whole concept untenable.

The problem for the evolutionist is that there are too many of these.  They range from the statistical problems of the spontaneous appearance of life, through the totally anti-evolutionary biochemical evidence, to the myriad logical problems which are thrown up by the fundamental changes which would have to take place from group to group.

Linked to this page are a series of essays on several aspects of life.  Evolution claims to explain at least some of these, but arguments are presented to show that these explanations simply don't work, factually or logically.

This brings up another important point.  If Evolution is so easy of proof why is so much effort still put in to prove it?  We don't have to do this with atoms, or with nuclear fusion, or any of the many, many other fundamental ideas that are now accepted.  Surely there should be no problem if evolution is so clear.